<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ben vs. Ben: The UFC 86 Argument, July 4th Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-17004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-17004</guid>
		<description>Lyoto Machida should be next in line, and I can't wait for him to take the belt from that absolute SHAM of "champion" Forrest Griffin.

In fact, until that opie-looking jackass is no longer in possession of a belt he didn't rightly win, I'll never watch UFC again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyoto Machida should be next in line, and I can&#8217;t wait for him to take the belt from that absolute SHAM of &#8220;champion&#8221; Forrest Griffin.</p>
<p>In fact, until that opie-looking jackass is no longer in possession of a belt he didn&#8217;t rightly win, I&#8217;ll never watch UFC again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higgz</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16762</link>
		<dc:creator>Higgz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16762</guid>
		<description>I'll bet you won't see Jackson &#38; Griffin getting an "...Of the Night" bonus because they will get one of those "Great Victory, here's a huge check" or "Sorry you lost, maybe this will cheer you up" Locker-Room bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet you won&#8217;t see Jackson &amp; Griffin getting an &#8220;&#8230;Of the Night&#8221; bonus because they will get one of those &#8220;Great Victory, here&#8217;s a huge check&#8221; or &#8220;Sorry you lost, maybe this will cheer you up&#8221; Locker-Room bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tully</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16752</link>
		<dc:creator>tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16752</guid>
		<description>i think guillard could get knockout of the night. he has arguably the best standup at 155. he also might be one of the most naturally talented and athletic fighters around. maybe he stopped doing coke and he is taking this seriously. when he's on his game he's a monster though so i understand why he is on payperview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think guillard could get knockout of the night. he has arguably the best standup at 155. he also might be one of the most naturally talented and athletic fighters around. maybe he stopped doing coke and he is taking this seriously. when he&#8217;s on his game he&#8217;s a monster though so i understand why he is on payperview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest's upset</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16608</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest's upset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16608</guid>
		<description>you can chop down a tree but it takes a long time to chop down a Forest. I know that was pretty gay but Rampage better pack a lunch. @ The Truth you are dead on Forest is too well rounded for Rampage to handle. Forest will be able to change to any number of gameplans while Rampage has one maybe two tricks in his repatoir. Rampage will be bewilderd by round two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can chop down a tree but it takes a long time to chop down a Forest. I know that was pretty gay but Rampage better pack a lunch. @ The Truth you are dead on Forest is too well rounded for Rampage to handle. Forest will be able to change to any number of gameplans while Rampage has one maybe two tricks in his repatoir. Rampage will be bewilderd by round two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellenAvalanche</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16594</link>
		<dc:creator>KellenAvalanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16594</guid>
		<description>I'm on acid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on acid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellenAvalanche</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16592</link>
		<dc:creator>KellenAvalanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16592</guid>
		<description>Forrest in a decision?  I think so.  We will see.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrest in a decision?  I think so.  We will see&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellenAvalanche</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16591</link>
		<dc:creator>KellenAvalanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16591</guid>
		<description>I like both fighters for different reasons, Forrest can take a serious beating while giving one out as well and Jackson is hilarious and entertaining as well as great so far in the UFC.  But I think Jackson still needs to beat Silva.  Why not?  Sure Silva has lost a couple in a row, not against him though.... You saw his knees against him, fucking BRUTAL.  Ramage fell out of the fucking ring, TKO'd.  i just think there should be a III.  You can say he beat Chuck, but him and Silva are toatally diff fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both fighters for different reasons, Forrest can take a serious beating while giving one out as well and Jackson is hilarious and entertaining as well as great so far in the UFC.  But I think Jackson still needs to beat Silva.  Why not?  Sure Silva has lost a couple in a row, not against him though&#8230;. You saw his knees against him, fucking BRUTAL.  Ramage fell out of the fucking ring, TKO&#8217;d.  i just think there should be a III.  You can say he beat Chuck, but him and Silva are toatally diff fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16588</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16588</guid>
		<description>I don't get the Rampage hype, I really don't.  He knocked out Chuck, big deal.  Anyone can get knocked out.  Two strikers fight, someone's getting knocked out and its often fairly random who that someone is.  Rampages win over Dan was more impressive and showed that he actually has some game, but, at best, Rampage was a decent Pride fighter who couldn't hold the jockstraps of guys like Wandy and Shogun.  Forrest is too well rounded for Rampage to handle. 

Forrest by submission in rd 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the Rampage hype, I really don&#8217;t.  He knocked out Chuck, big deal.  Anyone can get knocked out.  Two strikers fight, someone&#8217;s getting knocked out and its often fairly random who that someone is.  Rampages win over Dan was more impressive and showed that he actually has some game, but, at best, Rampage was a decent Pride fighter who couldn&#8217;t hold the jockstraps of guys like Wandy and Shogun.  Forrest is too well rounded for Rampage to handle. </p>
<p>Forrest by submission in rd 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teachbug</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16574</link>
		<dc:creator>teachbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16574</guid>
		<description>Sorry I didnt see a word you said, I was to busy saluting the flag.
God bless America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I didnt see a word you said, I was to busy saluting the flag.<br />
God bless America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMA Extreme</title>
		<link>http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/07/04/ben-vs-ben-the-ufc-86-argument-july-4th-edition/#comment-16513</link>
		<dc:creator>MMA Extreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagepotato.com/?p=1887#comment-16513</guid>
		<description>since nobody else is gonna do it... USA! USA! USA! USA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since nobody else is gonna do it&#8230; USA! USA! USA! USA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
