(Video courtesy TheMMAFix)
It looks like Dana White wasn’t thrilled with Jon Fitch‘s less than enthralling performance in his win over Thiago Alves at UFC 118 last month, since the UFC president has now rescinded an earlier assertion that the winner of the bout would be next in line for a title shot at the winner of December’s Georges St-Pierre-Josh Koscheck showdown.
During an appearance on Comcast Sportsnet Washington’s The MMA Fix, White said the welterweight title picture is a bit murkier than it seemed a few weeks ago, which may be partially a result of Fitch’s conservative stall and brawl tactics he employed to decision Alves.
"I want to wait for Koscheck and St-Perre to happen and we’ll figure out who gets the next shot," White explained noncommittally. "By then Jake Shields will have fought…Kampmann…you know…we’ll see what happens. A lot of it is timing too."
Martin Kampmann knows all about the kind of timing White is referring to.
He was slated to face Mike Swick at UFC 103 to decide which of them would get the next shot at St-Pierre, but when Paul Daley stepped in to replace and injured Swick, the title shot was pulled off the table. After losing to Daley, "Hitman," who won his first two bouts at 170 prior to his questionable TKO stoppage loss to "Semtex," has had to work his way back up the UFC’s welterweight ladder and has done in impressive fashion with decisive wins over Jacob Volkmann and Paulo Thiago.
Many argue that one win by Shields in the UFC as a welterweight, regardless of whom it’s over, shouldn’t lead to a title shot for the former Strikeforce middleweight champion, who hasn’t fought at 170 for nearly two years.
Somehow I think we’ll hear who’s next in line after Kampmann and Shields fight at UFC 121 on October 23, rather than after St-Pierre and Koscheck do on December 11 at UFC 124 and I doubt Jon Fitch will like the answer.








Post your comment
Showing 1-25 of comments
commentssame guys fighting the same guys... That's the problem in the LW division. Rua, Machida, Evans, Jackson... can we give some new blood a chance? I think Bader's record of 11-0 (4-0 UFC) should get him a shot relatively soon, and hopefully Jon Jones as well with his 9-1 (3-1 UFC), with his only loss being a DQ.
Uh....hmmm....you uh....damn.
It's just that...fuck it, nevermind...
GSP actually strikes and attempts submissions on his opponents. Not as much as we'd like lately, but he does. He made multiple sub attempts on Hardy... when was the last time Fitch even attempted any kind of submission?
For example, look at the Fightmetric stats for each of their fights against Thiago Alves: GSP had 149 strikes and 1 sub attempt, while Fitch had only 70 strikes and 0 sub attempts.
Shields vs GSP would probably look an awful lot like Fitch vs GSP did, with GSP stuffing all take down attempts and pounding his face in.
Honestly though, I don't care who gets the next shot - Kampmann, Fitch, whoever - as long as it is NOT Jake Shields.... seriously, make this guy EARN it like everyone else. And that means more than 1 UFC win.
Correction, GSP vs Kampmann would be different, Shields would be almost exactly the same as Fitch. In fact, Fitch would probably be an even more competitive fight for GSP, it's just that we've already seen it. Shields is pretty much the same skillset as Fitch, there's no real reason to think he has anything to threaten GSP with, but we haven't seen it yet so it's kinda new and different but not really... like banging your wife's twin sister.
Here's another prediction for you: Kampmann will beat Shields and it won't be a decision either. Kampmann will then get to fight GSP and I will get to see my two favorite welterweights do "the man dance."
That said, Fitch should sit on the sidelines for a bit longer, I'd rather see the Kampmann/Shields winner be the #1 contender, and then do Fitch vs the winner of Condit/Hardy or something, and if he wins that then give him his shot.
Or he could just go up to MW. Just do it Jon, for all of us.
Sign in
Register | Lost your password?
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Log in | Lost your password?