Steroids in MMA
Which MMA Fighter Will Test Positive For Steroids Next?

Gambling Addiction Enabler: ‘Jones vs. Matyushenko’ Edition


Things didn’t go so hot last time for your old buddy the Gambling Addiction Enabler. Sometimes you ride the bull, and sometimes the bull knocks two of your teeth out on a Russian game show. That’s life. But even if you never take our betting advice again, you owe it to yourselves to at least check out the odds for Sunday’s UFC Live: Jones vs. Matyushenko show, because whoever set the lines for the preliminary card must have been high on cheese. As always, the opportunity for profit is there, if you’re a little smart and very lucky. with the numbers…

Jon Jones (-505) vs. Vladimir Matyushenko (+450)
Yushin Okami (-185) vs. Mark Munoz (+180)
Jake Ellenberger (-155) vs. John Howard (+145)
Tyson Griffin (-275) vs. Takanori Gomi (+260)

Jacob Volkman (-116) vs. Paul Kelly (+115)
Matt Riddle (-150) vs. DaMarques Johnson (+185)
James Irvin (-160) vs. Igor Pokrajac (+155)
Mike Massenzio (-150) vs. Brian Stann (+140)
Charles Oliveira (-300) vs. Darren Elkins (+300)
Rob Kimmons (-215) vs. Steve Steinbeiss (+175)

Let’s go to work…

The Main Event: After crunching the numbers, I’ve determined that Vladimir Matyushenko has exactly zero ways to win this fight. Not that freak upsets don’t happen all the time in MMA, but that’s no justification to lay money on somebody, even if you’d theoretically get 4.5 times your investment in return. Matyushenko’s strength is his wrestling, and yet Jon Jones is a more dynamic, effective wrestler. Jones holds the edge in standup, and will be aided by an insane reach advantage. He’s more athletic and more creative than Matyushenko. The betting line reflects all this. But at -505, Jones isn’t worth a straight bet, and he’s barely worth including in a parlay. Let’s move on to the real action…

The Good ‘Dogs (aka "The Great Preliminary Card Clusterf*ck of 2010"): Man, where to begin. James Irvin is without a doubt the most cursed fighter on the UFC’s roster. Four out of his last five fights have ended with him writhing on the mat in pain, clutching either his eye or his knee, and he’s coming back from a horribly botched attempt at a middleweight run. Pokrajac may be 0-2 in the UFC, but I can’t help but think he’s a safer bet, simply because he isn’t a magnet for bad luck. At the very least, don’t put money on the Sandman.

Next on the list is Darren Elkins, whose +300 line should catch your attention like a $20 bill in a urinal. Do you dare pick it up? We know that Oliveira is an undefeated wrecking machine with great grappling credentials — but virtually all of his wins came against guys you’ve never heard of in Brazilian minor leagues. Elkins has already shook off the first-time Octagon jitters, and honestly, his resume is just as impressive. So why is he such a heavy underdog? Don’t ask, just place your wagers before the oddsmakers wise up.

Finally, Matt Riddle (-150) vs. DaMarques Johnson (+185). I had to read that three times to make sure the + and – weren’t in the wrong places. Johnson has been a walking highlight-reel since his time on TUF 9, scoring a Submission of the Night bonus against Edgar Garcia, and a Knockout of the Night award against Brad Blackburn. Riddle, on the other hand, has just sort of cruised along under the radar since his own TUF 7 stint, picking up decision wins over Steve Bruno and Dan Cramer, getting TKO’d by Nick Osipczak and taking a DQ victory after being upkicked by Greg Soto at UFC 111. Riddle has the advantage in wrestling, but Johnson has more weapons overall, and he should rightfully be the favorite in this fight.

Meanwhile, Back on the Main Card: With a similar toolset as Okami, Munoz has a solid chance at scoring an upset here; I don’t see him being physically bullied around like the guys Okami has defeated in the past. John Howard is also worth a look. He’s already 4-0 in the UFC, and though his victories haven’t always been pretty, he’s the definition of a gamer. (See his knockout win over Dennis Hallman at the TUF 10 Finale, with five seconds left in a fight that he might have lost on the scorecards.) For some reason, Howard’s name hasn’t caught on yet, which might be why he’s not getting the proper respect from oddsmakers. Gomi’s pretty much toast, though.

Suggested Wagering Breakdown, Based on a Hypothetical $50 Stake:
– $10 parlay on Jones + Griffin
– $10 on Johnson
– $10 on Elkins
– $10 on Pokrajac
– $5 on Munoz
– $5 on Howard


Think you know how these fights will play out? Head to or and make your predictions…

Cagepotato Comments

Showing 1-25 of comments

Sort by : Show hidden comments
TfTransplant- July 27, 2010 at 8:55 am
Did you miss Jones going all Roman Polansky on Hammil before the DQ? Hammil had nothing at all going for him in that fight. Very lucky to have it stopped before his brain spilled on the mat.
One Two- July 27, 2010 at 8:08 am
Am I missing something here? Has Jon Jones beat someone worth a shit sometime?
mt59801- July 27, 2010 at 2:33 am
Munoz is bad mofo, other than that fight I agree w/the bookies
Almost North- July 26, 2010 at 11:41 pm
Crack sounds safer
Lysol- July 26, 2010 at 5:21 pm
I might bet on Jon Jones to lose, simply because it's a better $10 investment than crack. If I weren't betting on horrible underdogs, I'd probably be smoking crack anyways.
Get Off Me- July 26, 2010 at 3:23 pm
I am betting on the Janitor str8's a risk but I got a good line.
Because I like you all so fucking much here's the parlay that's a can't miss, although one of the fighters received no love in the "analysis" above:


Thank me later.
cecils_pupils- July 26, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Jones is the anchor to my high value parlay:

Jones (-505)
Johnson (+185)
Munoz (+180)

All three will absolutely destroy their opponents.
shammy4life- July 26, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Vlad is a solid dude and a great fighter. One of the last few legitamately repping the old school MMA fighter. That being said he has no real chance to win this fight, it's kind of fucked up because the UFC could have had this dude fight Tito, or Hammil, or Forrest and it would of been a coin flip. He's a crazy old man for even taking this fight and for that you have got to respect him.
Clyde- July 26, 2010 at 2:11 pm
The sandman a favourite? Something very strange is going on here and I don't like it.
Homoplata- July 26, 2010 at 1:53 pm
"I've determined that Vladimir Matyushenko has exactly zero ways to win this fight // But at -505, Jones isn't worth a straight bet, and he's barely worth including in a parlay."


Marcer- July 26, 2010 at 1:50 pm
What the F Ben, John Howard over Ellenburger? Howard doesnt get respect because he's not far from being 1-3 in the octagon. Jake's a great value at anything close to even. Good thing I jumped on that line early. Weeee.
BigCountrysCholesterol- July 26, 2010 at 1:29 pm
I want to see some new Jon Jones crazy improv skills almost as much as I want to see the video of Aleks getting dealt with by the bull.