
(‘Furthermore, I’d like to say that there’s at least a chance that I didn’t do anything wrong, and I am kind of committed to partially clearing my name of most of these possibly erroneous charges.’)
Here’s what’s weird about the statement Josh Barnett made on his MySpace blog this morning with regards to his current steroid-related licensing issues in California: never does he actually come out and say that he didn’t do it. At best, Barnett implies his innocence. He suggests that he was surprised to have failed the steroid test, but stops short of saying that it would have been impossible for him to have popped positive. In a sporting world where we all just expect athletes to vehemently deny steroid use right up until conclusive proof emerges, this is not a good sign. Check it out and see what we mean:
Many of you are wondering what’s happening. What I can say is that when applying for my license, the CSAC asked for me to submit a urine sample for testing prior to granting my license as they do with everyone, I believe. It was not a random test. I had no reason to believe there would be any issues and went in to submit my sample at the earliest possible opportunity on June 25th. I never once thought there would be a problem.
My representatives and I are working to gather as much info as possible and handle this situation as best as we can. I am embarrassed and want for nothing more than to resolve this issue and receive a license from the State of California as I have done many times already and for other states as well. I am very thankful for all the great family, friends and fans that still support me.
See what we mean? He never thought there would be a problem. That could mean a lot of things. It could mean, for example, that he was sure he had cycled that stuff out of his system by now. Or it could mean that since he never used steroids he never had any reason to think there was something to worry about. We just don’t know.
What we do know, however, if we’ve learned anything from all those episodes of “The First 48,” is that when an innocent man is accused he bangs his fist on the table as he declares his innocence and tells you to go fuck yourself. The guy who’s guilty, or who at the very least drove the getaway car, mumbles something into his lap and asks for a cigarette. All we’re saying is, Josh Barnett ain’t exactly banging his fist on the table right now.








Post your comment
Showing 1-25 of comments
commentsGoddamn, that was fucking hilarious. Bravo.
fedor is over rated...... lesnar would own him
See you at Polo: Hullaballoo.
Let's assume he's gonna come out with some lame ass excuse of taking some OTC supplements that "may" have triggered a false positive result for a banned substance in a drug test. At this stage in his career, Josh Barnett should have fucking well known what was going to screw him up; how long it would take to flush out his system; and not to trust questionable supplement manufacturers. If he doesn't know this by now, hes one dumb fuck.
Even if Vitor Belfort is capable of stepping in for Josh Barnett, and even if he can defeat Fedor Emelianenko, there's precious few fighters around who could step in on a moment's notice without looking like a poor substitution. I mean no disrespect to Vitor Belfort. It's just that so much hype and publicity has been built around Josh Barnett and Fedor Emelianenko, who could step in at the 11th hour and still preserve a degree of excitement? Randy Couture?
Someone should have coached Josh Barnett on what to say before he had his massive online brainfart. Even if his second sample comes up clean as a whistle, this is not gonna look good for him to get sponsors much less alone a spot on a card.
I smell a lawsuit coming: Barrnet vs GNC - false advertising!
Sign in
Register | Lost your password?
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Log in | Lost your password?