So, Mac Danzig proved a few things at Saturday’s Ultimate Fighter 6 finale: 1) I should really stop making public predictions. 2) Experience trumps raw power. 3) With his killer ground-and-pound and the ability to end nearly every fight in a rear naked choke, Danzig may already be a top-5 contender in the UFC’s lightweight division. The UFC is pretty aggressive about pulling their vids from YouTube, so get it while it’s hot…








Post your comment
Showing 1-25 of comments
commentsDecember 11th, 2007 at 5:29 pm
I am 5?10? and weigh in around 225-230 during normal days.
5'10 and 230?!?! you must be one fat fukk!!
When's he fighting again?
Do either of those guys look fat to you? If two people are atheletes and they both have extremely low body fat %, and one weighs 20lbs more than the other... that one is more than likely a hell of a lot stronger. Do you really think people would sit in a sauna in a trashbag suit on an exercise bike and sweat off 20lb of water if it didn't give them any advantage in their sport?? You are the stupid one...
Tommy is a farm boy so he's got some crazy hidden farm-working strength.
You have to be confident. You can't go into fights saying to yourself " Man I am gonna lose". I lose sometimes. No one is perfect, as can be seen by my spelling/gramatical error above, which was so quickley pointed out by Senex.
1.they were the same weight at the weight in(which is the day before the fight). just about every fighter cuts weights. they do that in wrestling, boxing, kickboxing, mma, and possibly ice skating.
2. mac actually weighted in at 168, and weighted 168 the day of the fight, which is lighter than required 170. and the kickers is MAC DOES NOT CUT WEIGHT. while tommy probably weighted about 195lb to 200lbs(possibly more) on fight day. so yes, in theory, tommy should have been much stronger.
3. no, short guys don't necessary win everytime. taller guys have reach advantage on their feet, and advantage on the ground as well because it's easier to pull of some of the submissions. there are way too many variables in mma to just contribute a win or lose to one factor, such as height.
With equal skills I would win more often then not. Things that can throw that off would be someone with an exceptionally long reach, lucky shots, mistakes, etc.
Mac simply was more skilled then Tommy.
Sign in
Register | Lost your password?
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Log in | Lost your password?