
(One brief moment from the “dull affair” that was Lawler-Smith)
New York Times reporter Joshua Robinson either didn’t really watch Elite XC’s event on Saturday night, or he didn’t understand what he was seeing. Those are the only two explanations I can come up with anyway, considering that he had this to say about the Robbie Lawler-Scott Smith middleweight title bout:
The next bout, between Robbie Lawler and Scott Smith, was a dull affair. The officials stopped it in the third round after what they deemed an accidental foul — Smith took a thumb in his right eye — and the bout was declared a no contest. But that fight was quickly forgotten when Slice stole the show.
It’s interesting to note that this is the perspective of someone hired by the New York Times — one of the best newspapers in the nation — to write about sporting events for a living. If he could have misconstrued what was happening in the cage so badly, is it possible that mainstream America was confused as well?
We gave Elite XC a hard time for their event as a whole, but to refer to Lawler-Smith as a “dull affair” is a statement that is untenable at best. It makes you wonder if it was the sporadic boos during the fight or the fact that it was actually pretty technical and not an all-out slugfest that prompted this reporter to start looking at his watch. Either way, he probably should have kept his eyes on the action. That, or the Times should have assigned someone who knew something about the sport they were covering.
In other news from the MMA world…
- Elite XC welterweight and former Team Takedown member Eric Bradley has been arrested on charges of burglary, along with a lot of other charges that often accompany burglary, such as receiving stolen property, criminal trespass, and “prowling”. Five Ounces of Pain got the scoop on the story this afternoon, and while Bradley, who last fight on Elite XC’s “Street Certified” event (ironic, no?), isn’t exactly a big name for the organization, this is still the worst possible time for this kind of news.
Sam Caplan reports that Ted Ehrhardt, the founder of Team Takedown, which takes promising collegiate wrestlers and grooms them as MMA fighters, disclosed that Bradley had been released from the team for “personal issues” about a month ago.
- All fifteen fighters drug tested for UFC 84 passed with flying colors. No performance-enhancing or recreational drugs were found in tests of Sean Sherk, B.J. Penn, Keith Jardine, Wanderlei Silva, Tito Ortiz, Lyoto Machida, Rousimar Palhares, Ivan Salaverry, Rameau Thierry Sokoudjou, Rich Clementi, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Shane Carwin, Thiago Silva, Dong Hyun Kim. Is it a statement about the world we live in that this is considered newsworthy? Probably. Best not to dwell on it though.
- Matt Hughes has confirmed that he will take on Matt Serra after his bout with Thiago Alves at UFC 85 this weekend, regardless of the outcome of the fight. Hughes also says that if he beats both Alves and Serra he expects another shot at title-holder Georges St. Pierre. One can only assume that Dana White told him that the same way you tell a child that if they’re really good you’ll take them for ice cream.








Post your comment
Showing 1-25 of comments
commentsHere is the version I sent to all 4 addresses:
To Whom It May Concern:
To start, I have been following the sport of Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) for the past 10 years and I am by no means an expert. I do, however, know enough about the sport to recognize a fraud.
I recently read Joshua Robinson’s summary of the EliteXC MMA event on CBS, titled “Pulling No Punches, Brawler Wins His Prime-Time Debut” (published June 1st), and it immediately occurred to me that Mr Robinson had absolutely no idea what he was looking at.
I don’t mean this as an ad hominem attack, because my letter is not about a difference of opinions. I would bet a significant amount of money that Mr Robinson has not seen more than 3 MMA events in his lifetime and I would bet another that he was either distracted or absent during the fights which he describes. It’s painfully obvious to any fan of MMA (or any other combat sport, such as wrestling or boxing) that his summary was written in less than 10 minutes without the author actually watching those fights, or even doing the appropriate amount of research.
Please consider advising Mr Robinson to research the sport of MMA and watch the fights before he writes another MMA related article. Perhaps a journalist familiar with boxing would be able to watch the entire event. Otherwise, maybe refrain from writing a piece just to capitalize on a "hot" topic.
I would also like to point out that this summary is already making rounds on MMA websites (e.g. CagePotato) and most readers are finding it quite amusing and disappointing at the same time.
He obviously enjoyed the Kimbo fight more, e.g. "But that fight was quickly forgotten when Slice stole the show.”
The guy's a fuckin' idiot.
ARRGGGGHHHH...
i wish we could just stick to Showtime EXC's [like the one w/ Yves/KJ coming up that is actually going to be good.. even though i enjoyed lawler/smith, villa/baroni, and carano/young] WEC's, Fight Nights, and PPV's.. because i was happy before all this.. i really think this might have brought shame to the MMA world!
i mean, we have reporters that don't know the half about MMA, let alone either of the fighters in the ring, and he calls the FOTN a freakin' "dull affair".. here's a question.. did you enjoy Kimbo/Thompson more?? if so.. kill yourself..
"The next bout, between Robbie Lawler and Scott Smith, was a dull affair. The officials stopped it in the third round after what they deemed an accidental foul — Smith took a thumb in his right eye — and the bout was declared a no contest. But that fight was quickly forgotten when Slice stole the show."
bottom line ____ that guy's a DICK.. there's not other way to put it.. what a f**king DICK!
Thankyou. It makes me so mad I can't really explain it. It's almost like someone pounding your EX girlfriend your still in love with, there is nothing you can do but beat on them to make you feel better and you know it's wrong.
Great. I will probably use most of that! when I do write
Well done!
PUBLIC EDITOR: public@nytimes.com
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: letters@nytimes.com
NEWS DEPARTMENT (FOR CORRECTIONS): nytnews@nytimes.com
WEB EDITOR: webeditor@nytimes.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I recently read Joshua Robinson's summary of the EliteXC MMA event on CBS, titled "Pulling No Punches, Brawler Wins His Prime-Time Debut" (published June 1st), and it immediately occurred to me that Mr Robinson had absolutely no idea what he was looking at.
I don't mean this as an ad hominem attack, because my letter is not about a difference of opinions. I would bet a significant amount of money that Mr Robinson has not seen more than 3 MMA events in his lifetime and I would bet another that he was either distracted or absent during the fights which he describes. It's painfully obvious to any fan of MMA (or any other combat sport, such as wrestling or boxing) that his summary was written in less than 10 minutes without the author actually watching those fights.
Please consider advising Mr Robinson to research the sport of MMA and watch the fights before he writes another MMA related article. Perhaps a journalist familiar with boxing would be able to watch the entire event.
I would also like to point out that this summary is already making rounds on MMA websites (e.g. CagePotato) and most readers are finding it quite amusing.
Alex, a concerned NY Times reader
It is a shame that it got stopped for the accidental fingers in the eye. But that's the sport. Lawler was great about it and recognized his "wrong" right away and let the ref know it.
I could be off but all the fights seemed to stopped pre-maturely to me.. as if.. CBS PRIME TIME was scared to show any damage... except the Kimbo fight, that should have been stopped when Kimbo was sleeping on the matt not defending himself.
Speaking of Kimbo...
why was KIMBO headlining and not the BELT match between Lawler/Smith. This shit is all backasswards!
Sign in
Register | Lost your password?
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Log in | Lost your password?