(Oh, good. For a second we thought he was mad at us. Turns out it’s some other site called Cagecrapato.com. Wouldn’t want to be those poor bastards right now.)
It’s times like these when we’re glad we do all our blogging from a special groovy submarine in the middle of the Atlantic, because otherwise we might be a little worried about the enormous pro fighter who is pissed off at us. Clearly, this post rattled Shane Carwin’s cage just a little bit, and he apparently didn’t appreciate our attempts at offering possible nickname ideas either, which is really the fault of you, our readers, since they were your suggestions. Whoever is to blame, Carwin doesn’t seem to think we’re as funny as our mothers keep telling us we are.
Look Shane, we didn’t mean anything by it. All we’re saying is, if you use Twitter to announce stuff to the world, you can’t really turn around and then complain that people are watching you. That’s the point of Twitter. When one signs up for an account, one is asking to be watched. That’s all.
Or maybe it was all a misunderstanding about that last sentence, when the word bitchassness (not a real word) appeared? We thought it was pretty clear that we were saying that it was Cain Velasquez who would look like the purveyor of bitchassery if the fight didn’t happen. But, wait a minute. If we say that then we’ll end up with Velasquez pissed off at us, which is arguably just as bad. But if we don’t clarify it, we risk running afoul of Carwin, whose bandwagon we’ve been riding for months now. This is quite a dilemma. We’d better consult our bosses at AKA and find out what to do.